RE-Juvenile's space

Judge Horner needs to be impeached - Please help send him the message he is not god

Please inquire Please Look up RULE 53 REFORM in a Google search...

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:12 AM


Oh, I'm allowed to see him any time I want, especially since she said, "I know youll be there everyday". Zack has allowed him to visit and gave him away but wants to enforce Full Custody and "no contact" only as far as the school is conserned, but not allowing me to tell them. (Will not allow me to call the school). <--- Right... Like she is my publisit and attorney like she was for my daughter...lo lol... My asssets are not in her 'sweet hands'.............

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: SPC Brian P Shaver's Mom is blessed! :)
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:08 AM


Hon, are you saying that you are not being allowed to see your son???

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 12:01 PM


Folder One - #20



I know my son was gone for the weekend with his friends. Here I was trying to see if Darlene Roger's went with Bleu to find what kind of relationship Bleu and her have. (I am making sure she is not spending weekends with him trying to 'bond with him, or influence him on a serious, 'inappropriate', level.) All my questions seem to irritate her but I finally get her to communicate her dissatisfaction with the way I treat her.



That Saturday I spoke to Darlene's mother, June Rogers, at her home and she told me Dolly had the day off and was resting and relaxing and that it is funny she should say that 'she was at work', because she never takes the dog to work. I also was told she heard the dog earlier that morning.



On Monday I find out my son went to visit a friend he meet in Pre-school, Connor. I was told by Darlene Rogers this family lived in Salem, the family that Zachariah Burton Singleton was angry with for convincing Bleu 'his dad told them he could go live with them'. These are the people Zachariah put on the Status Quo as people he intended to give partial custody to. Zack had only met them once. This tells me, Bleu, again is trying to negotiate his way out of living with his father, as he did in the past, congruent with harsh feelings today, and that he does not feel he is settled or satisfied with Darlene Rogers as a permanent place to live, which is consistent with Bleu will have to make up his mind at the end of the School year about where he wants to live. Melanie told me Bleu is to blame for Zack and Jenna's divorce and that all they do is yell at him and that Jenna does not want him because he is not her flesh and blood. That Jenna wants Bleu to leave.



Bleu was enrolled in school before I found out he was in Portland. Temporary Guardianship papers were signed so Bleu could decide where he wanted to live. Darlene Rogers has told me, 'there is that Court Order in place' and she will not divert from it at the School but every where else is OK to ignore it as long as it does not come to the attention of the school. I called the school pretending to enroll a new student to see what the reaction would be when I told them my name. (My son reported Dolly complained as she came in the door after work on the day I contacted the enrollment department, PTA, etc. ). I am told by Darlene Rogers not to contact the school. My son expresses apprehension and said, "No body would accept your contact information even for a live and death emergency".



('For nearly one year I requested Darlene Rogers tell me the city Zack lived in so I could file a substitute service seeking visitation with my son'). In spite the fact, Zack currently has allowed visitation between Bleu and I, I am not placed on the school records as a person to contact in case of an emergency, but, it is OK with Darlene Rogers that I visit him and that I could begin visits right away even as early as 9:00 (that same day because Bleu had the whole day to spend before he started school) Darlene is at work - the time she stated she has a regular scheduled work day). I have explained to Darlene Rogers there was never a case brought against me regarding the allegations against my parenting, and that there was no reasonable cause to believe child abuse or neglect occurred, that CPS can not present a case because the statute of limitations is up, that one year has expired and this matter has not resolved itself yet, since Judge Horner ordered to hear from the CPS and they did not follow a direct court order, that I do not have to contact that agency according to my rights to Due Process when the case is closed and I am told the agency is not responding, that Judge Horner can not 'Adjudicate and then say he needs to adjudicate further, on the same matter, is against my right to not be tried twice', that I was not given a friar trial, not given an opportunity to present evidence, not allowed to ask questions to my opponent in court, that the original order to move Blue to his dad's was in violation of Supreme Court rule, [a home can not be made in a day, (or in seven months or in three years in this case,) A judge, like William Horner, is not supposed to stall in delivering his adjudication causing another violation when he signed papers not presented to him by a moving party, (making him party to the action) to prepare his own papers to sign, which Zachariah Singleton failed to do, also causing another compromise at the clerks office for putting such a document into the mail, now further, the worst offense I see, Judge Horner did in violation of the Separation of Powers, acting as DA, demanded discovery after he had delivered a verbal order, which has caused continual Arbitrarily Restraint which is currently my Death Penalty and exacted the method in which others inflict upon me 'social death', allowing others to Terminated my Parental rights, placing me under social duress to comply with further violations against the Oath of Office, (continually supporting, as current circumstances, the mute allegation asserted as cause to bring the Independence Police Department to Arrest my daughter and threaten to kick down my front door because I demanded CPS show a search warrant from a real judge. on and on, and on. I have had no show of support from Darlene Rogers other that what she claims as her obedience to what she is told to do even if she thinks it is so unjust and against all she would have for me in her heart.



My son told me, "My dad said I had a choice of places I could live". Darlene Rogers confirmed Zack did say Bleu could come to live with me and she has not revealed to me the details regarding what date someone contacted her regarding Bleu's wishes to no longer live with his dad. I have no information other than what I hear from my son and Melanie regarding this matter.



I have not been included in any conversations regarding how she portrays my relationship with herself when conversing with Bleu's father. Darlene Rogers has not explained why she, in spite my wishes she have no contact with Bleu, has put herself in as an alternate option for permanent placement when I have diligently (for the last year and more) explained to her and other people who announce to her my complaints and things I say, like; 'she is not allowed in my home', 'I am very angry with her for letting a criminal move in with my daughter while she was in foster care', 'that if the State bills me for the money given to her she will be the person I say should pay it back since she is in breach of contract and failed in her duty to supervise me daughter', 'I will not be attending holiday activities in her home anymore so don't invite me', 'if I had Bleu in my care she would not be allowed in his life at all', 'she is not to introduce me as her daughter to people', 'I resent the fact she has preserved her relationship with my son over mine by not helping me with the things I ask of her so I may take care of legal issues'. All these messages and conversations transpired prior to end of my and my son's alienated condition.



Darlene Roger's constantly sends the message she does not want to talk to me.



---------Why are my calls bad?



"No I just tried calling you a minute ago and it failed."



--------- Oh.



"Anyway, what, what is going on, what do you need?"



--------- Oh, I was just seeing about the ride to pick up Bleu.



Oh, well, why, that's ten hours or so, I got to go to work right now, I gotta' go pick up the kids from church.



"Well I'm trying to set an appointment what time...



Later on in the conversation she yells at me about how I don't even like her, you have not called me in years, your not calling to talk to me, your using my minutes, all the sudden you call me twenty times a day, you must have free minutes on your phone, Melanie won't let me baby-sit Victoria, I don't want to ride with you for two hours and listen to you. ( my legal interpretations ). tell me what to do, ( this would apply especially now that she has 'control' ) ., all you do is argue, I don't want to fight, (pre emptive - I just go on and on about Impeaching a judge and that is not what she wants to talk about and has stated "That is not what Bleu wants", ). [I know that is not what his dad wants and for Darlene Rogers to have Zack as a friend she is going to have to say, 'All hail to Horner's demand to try Marilyn LeBaron twice]. but she is not my son's lawyer when she is a direct opponent also contending for his permanency decision.and certainly she should not be a witness if she stands to directly gain from her testimony.



Darlene Roger's constantly sends the message she does not want to talk to me.

Folder 0ne - 1



[Phony Cheerfulness with stress in her voice all over the place].

She is letting me know she does not have time to talk to me.



Darlene Rogers.. Hello?



­­­­­­­­­­­---------Hey, What is going on? It's Marilyn.



Darlene Rogers.. Ah, I, Yeah!



---------Yeah!



Darlene Rogers.. Chuckle. You called early; I was getting in the shower.. Giggle. Oh! "Hello?"



---------Yeah!



---------Well, I mean I, was right there on the couch yesterday when you called Melanie to tell her you had Bleu.



Darlene Rogers.. "Yes!", "Yeah".



"That's what, yeah, I called. I-I told her, I told her, I said, "Well", yah, cause I, that way I know she could pass that on to you while I was on my way to work, cause I, she was just, I was just pulling up into the driveway.



"Yeah!"



and told her to pass that on".




----- Original Message -----

From: eBLAWg
To: robin.mimms@state.or.us
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:23 AM
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman


Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman

Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...

Please help me but I demand you keep this out of the hands of the CPS... (Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict of interest for them, who are being sued by millions all over this nation, to handle my allegation against them! -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law at the whim of a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish to uphold my right to incommunicado form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.

This matter should be treated as a matter for the Justice System and kept out of Family Court. I demand my son be left alone and you people rely on my tape recording of his free and relaxed statements while under my questioning! My son, as well as my daughter and I are potential witness against Darlene Rogers if it is proved she ''miss managed money entrusted to her'' by an elderly woman who embraced her as 'family', like we, the LeBaron family, were honored in the Roger's home for many years.

I have instructed my son to say, if ever questioned by the CPS, to say, "You are not my counsel of choice".
I do not allow any contact with my son at his school especially by a CPS worker and I do not authorize any psychological evaluations to be ordered by any State Agency or Child Protection Worker. This because of the Witherspoon case in California, which established as a president the one clinical evaluation can overturn three judges who all said Julie should get her kids back.

My son is being used as a messenger to show Darlene Roger's has more influence than me over the interpretations surrounding her method of restitution for moneys she claimed where taken by her mother without her knowing from a bank account in both their names. (This is what Bleu told me). June Rogers said she knows nothing of this and I agreed with her when she said she would never speak out against her daughter. I infer: (for her to put all the blame on her mother) if a SEARCH WARRANT was gotten it would have to be proved Darlene Roger's never opened a bank statement and all the checks or withdrawals would have to be signed in her mother's hand except the very last as Darlene Rogers claimed she took out herself full knowing the money's were almost depleted. She usually puts notes on her papers, checks, deposit slips, so forth. I know she does balance her bank statements as she normally does but I don't know what account she deposited the money in. Bleu said she had a new bank and that 'they' had a story if 'his dad was to ask'. (sos here please). I asked my son if he knew about the money, which Dolly said she spent, which belonged to Pearl, a long time friend of the Roger's women, June and her daughter, two women I considered to be, 'mom' and grand mom. My son has replied with what Darlene Roger's has prompted him to say if he is ever asked questions which is evidence there is a breach of trust between her and I, since she knows I am very angry with her and deliberately interfering with my son's return to me to keep us both in her nest. She snapping at me while in the middle of raising her voice to me, and confessing 'my true feeling for her', "I know you will be here everyday". She also said she knows I am not calling her to see her, which is a 'no brainer' because she has me and my son under her control and I have avidly expressed my discontentment with her without relenting for over a year now.

I fully expect Darlene's thinking is, "This will stay in the 'family', along with all the other arguments" while scolding me, "Melanie won't let me watch Victoria!", blaming that on me... then later moving to control me and my contact with her while visiting my son which resulted in an ultimatum and a direct order that I do not contradict her in front of 'my' son, and other petty things, after I asked her not to degrade me in front of him at our visits.

I am afraid of this woman and have been for quite some time now feeling like I am held hostage by her only praying to find a shred of evidence some where of how to contact my son's and his father. Zack being adamant about not having anything to do with me, him and his wife, Jenna, objecting of 'but loads of mail", according to my son who asked me if I had ever threatened them. My ILSUP has got me into trouble here (I think) because Bleu mentioned the pictures I drew, which his father showed him intending to complain about my poor judgment in mailing them to him. This is in evidence because Zack mailed those drawings to Judge Horner trying to make trouble for me. I am not a detective but insist on getting a reaction out of people and try to document what caused them to be so prejudice so I can reflect on what they report as cause, (reflecting on my probable cause rights) this to show they focus on all the stuff that came up after the fact of my prayers and praise to my pastor in the fall of 2004. Please see the State of Oregon protection of bureaucrat confused as cause after the SECOND SET OF 'non' consolidated, DOUBLE CASE CONTINUANCES 'partially consolidated', (RULE 53 See: Judge Luukinen for a CONSTITUTIONAL EXPLANATION). My ILSUP should not be a factor here since it never wound up in the discovery, which is true even in the Court Record and what Max R. Wall's based his Attestations UNDER OATH! [I NEVER EXPECTED THAT!] I was trying to get physical proof of what motivated my opponents on the matters pertaining to my children. Instead of justice I got diagnosed with a new mental disease though never in receipt of and invitation to 'family unity meetings' or offered a reunification plan for either my children.

Please Uphold and Defend the Constitution of the United States on these matters while keeping to the State constitution that a bureaucrat is not supposed to have a special position which is the equivalent of all having the right to equal protection. in so. None of this is to be read by Michael D Shrunk. I reject his leadership and declare him to be my families political enemy because he would allow us to be menaced with the threat of the equivalent of the Death Penalty and deny us due process of law while a threat is leveraged by his constituent which causes him to send the message, "I can prosecute you if you don't want to be named a victim", & "My constituents will make sure to make your daughter one if you don't let me represent you".

Please bear in mind all your hands as policemen or women are just as dirty as Judge Horner's if you don't put a stop to kicking in people's doors without a proper search warrant based of probable case because parents are being handed the equivalent of the Death Penalty everyday in 'America' -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law.)-


You have a copy of this already but it is relevant.

August 4, 2007

Department of Human Services
Child Protective Services
177 SW Oak St
Dallas, Oregon 97338


Dear Disclosure Officer,


Pursuant to the state open records law, Or. Rev. Stat. sec. 192.410 to 192.524, I write to request access to and a copy of any facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions regarding 'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect. If your agency does not maintain these public records, please let me know who does and include the proper custodian's name and address.


I agree to pay any reasonable copying and postage fees of not more than $.60 cents, as not to cause undue delay and for that reason only. If the cost would be greater than this amount, please notify me. Please provide a receipt indicating the charges for each document·

As provided by the open records law, I would request your response within seven (7) days.

If you choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation for the denial including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s) upon which you rely. Also, please provide all segregable portions of otherwise exempt material.


Please be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy necessary to obtain access to the requested records. I would note that willful violation of the open records law can result in the award of litigation costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney fees.

Thank you for your assistance.


Sincerely,



UCC 1-308, Thomas AB LeBaron, and Marilyn LeBaron, Power of Attorney in Fact, in Propria Persona by Special Visitation

portland, oregon [97233]

Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and postage if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither my children nor I wish any contact with your agency, period, for any reason.

DHS IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO BE OUR COUNSEL OF CHOICE. YOU ARE FIRED.

(503) 262-6723

----------------------------------

Any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.



----------------------------------



any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Melanie LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding harm or eminent threat.



----------------------------------



any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding harm or eminent threat with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect.



----------------------------------



any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------



all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to uphold the Sixth Amendment right to PRESENTMENT, in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, directly pertaining to CPS activity toward protecting my son from any damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect. Please include any documented comments from any staff members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes are included as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------



all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to uphold the Sixth Amendment, our inalienable right to PRESENTMENT, entered in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS activity presented as protective or remedial toward protecting my son from damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect. Please include any documented comments from any staff members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes are included as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005. Please include any letters of correspondence by and between any agencies authorized and mandated to cross report if said correspondence could be construed as cross reporting but limited your response to that which is directed from DHS staff toward the numerous letters mailed to DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------



Please include any documented comments from any staff members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes included as Exhibits as 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005. Please include any letters of correspondence by and between any agencies authorized and mandated to cross report if said correspondence which could be construed as cross reporting but limited your response to that which is directed from DHS staff toward numerous letters mailed to DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions 'harm', 'conditions and circumstances', 'ability to manage' or 'recognize' 'safety threats'



----------------------------------



all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, PCC C, Horner presiding, with relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the date November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations extended to DHS staff to uphold the Sixth Amendment, or PRESENTMENT, entered in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS activity in and attempt to gain an opportunity for a rebuttal of allegations presented to Zachariah B. Singleton on February 08, 2005 and presented as protective or remedial toward protecting my son from damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect.



----------------------------------



any facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions regarding 'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III, which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police Department, on November 18, 2005. Please include Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show cause Supervisory Staff had good cause to say, there would have been a FOUNDED case in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions 'harm', 'conditions and circumstances', and 'ability to manage or recognize safety threats', with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED case in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat', with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005. Please include any demands for access to any information thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only prior to April 2005 and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are relevant to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06, 2005

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED case", in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat', with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005

----------------------------------

Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and postage if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither my children nor I wish to be contacted CPS Agents, period, for any reason.

Please include any demands for access to any information thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, prior to April 2005 and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are relevant to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06, 2005.

----------------------------------

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Kristin, an 'Edwards Democrat'
Date: Apr 12, 2008 8:59 PM


I can do. I was trying to read your myspace but my laptop won't cooperate. If you have a lot of stuff on your myspace, my computers eats it lol ;)

What is your son's name? I imagine you have a cause on your page. What it is? Also, when I repost this in bulletin or blog or both.... I will credit your myspace page! :)

Thanks!
Kristin



All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
              UCC 1-308
          Marilyn LeBaron  
                  &
          LeBaron Family
 
 
Thomas LeBaron
Victoria Couvillion
 
NTBAA 
 
THOMAS LEBARON VICTORIA COUVILLION without Due Process
 
Marilyn LeBaron
Melanie LeBaron

NTBAA 
 
MARILYN LEBARON MELANIE LEBARON without Due Process 

                                                  Yuwie  

http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498

         Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information,

            verify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.

                    Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.

                  (Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)

                       Hit the back button to get out of pop ups

---

Subject: RE: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:12:05 -0700
From: Charlene.Barber@state.or.us
To: e-for-mation@hotmail.com

Why did I get this?????

And who are you????

 

Charlene Barber 

DPSST

Executive Assistant

503-378-2043

charlene.barber@state.or.us

 

 

---

From: eBLAWg [mailto:e-for-mation@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:21 AM
To: BARBER Charlene
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman

 

Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman

 

Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...

 

Please help me but I demand you keep this out of the hands of the CPS... (Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict of interest for them, who are being sued by millions all over this nation, to handle my allegation against them! -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law at the whim of a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish to uphold my right to incommunicado form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.

 

This matter should be treated as a matter for the Justice System and kept out of Family Court. I demand my son be left alone and you people rely on my tape recording of his free and relaxed statements while under my questioning! My son, as well as my daughter and I are potential witness against Darlene Rogers if it is proved she ''miss managed money entrusted to her'' by an elderly woman who embraced her as 'family', like we, the LeBaron family, were honored in the Roger's home for many years.

 

I have instructed my son to say, if ever questioned by the CPS, to say, "You are not my counsel of choice".
I do not allow any contact with my son at his school especially by a CPS worker and I do not authorize any psychological evaluations to be ordered by any State Agency or Child Protection Worker. This because of the Witherspoon case in California, which established as a president the one clinical evaluation can overturn three judges who all said Julie should get her kids back.

 

My son is being used as a messenger to show Darlene Roger's has more influence than me over the interpretations surrounding her method of restitution for moneys she claimed where taken by her mother without her knowing from a bank account in both their names. (This is what Bleu told me). June Rogers said she knows nothing of this and I agreed with her when she said she would never speak out against her daughter. I infer: (for her to put all the blame on her mother) if a SEARCH WARRANT was gotten it would have to be proved Darlene Roger's never opened a bank statement and all the checks or withdrawals would have to be signed in her mother's hand except the very last as Darlene Rogers claimed she took out herself full knowing the money's were almost depleted. She usually puts notes on her papers, checks, deposit slips, so forth. I know she does balance her bank statements as she normally does but I don't know what account she deposited the money in. Bleu said she had a new bank and that 'they' had a story if 'his dad was to ask'. (sos here please). I asked my son if he knew about the money, which Dolly said she spent, which belonged to Pearl, a long time friend of the Roger's women, June and her daughter, two women I considered to be, 'mom' and grand mom. My son has replied with what Darlene Roger's has prompted him to say if he is ever asked questions which is evidence there is a breach of trust between her and I, since she knows I am very angry with her and deliberately interfering with my son's return to me to keep us both in her nest. She snapping at me while in the middle of raising her voice to me, and confessing 'my true feeling for her', "I know you will be here everyday". She also said she knows I am not calling her to see her, which is a 'no brainer' because she has me and my son under her control and I have avidly expressed my discontentment with her without relenting for over a year now.

 

I fully expect Darlene's thinking is, "This will stay in the 'family', along with all the other arguments" while scolding me, "Melanie won't let me watch Victoria!", blaming that on me... then later moving to control me and my contact with her while visiting my son which resulted in an ultimatum and a direct order that I do not contradict her in front of 'my' son, and other petty things, after I asked her not to degrade me in front of him at our visits.

 

I am afraid of this woman and have been for quite some time now feeling like I am held hostage by her only praying to find a shred of evidence some where of how to contact my son's and his father. Zack being adamant about not having anything to do with me, him and his wife, Jenna, objecting of 'but loads of mail", according to my son who asked me if I had ever threatened them. My ILSUP has got me into trouble here (I think) because Bleu mentioned the pictures I drew, which his father showed him intending to complain about my poor judgment in mailing them to him. This is in evidence because Zack mailed those drawings to Judge Horner trying to make trouble for me. I am not a detective but insist on getting a reaction out of people and try to document what caused them to be so prejudice so I can reflect on what they report as cause, (reflecting on my probable cause rights) this to show they focus on all the stuff that came up after the fact of my prayers and praise to my pastor in the fall of 2004. Please see the State of Oregon protection of bureaucrat confused as cause after the SECOND SET OF 'non' consolidated, DOUBLE CASE CONTINUANCES 'partially consolidated', (RULE 53 See: Judge Luukinen for a CONSTITUTIONAL EXPLANATION). My ILSUP should not be a factor here since it never wound up in the discovery, which is true even in the Court Record and what Max R. Wall's based his Attestations UNDER OATH! [I NEVER EXPECTED THAT!] I was trying to get physical proof of what motivated my opponents on the matters pertaining to my children. Instead of justice I got diagnosed with a new mental disease though never in receipt of and invitation to 'family unity meetings' or offered a reunification plan for either my children.

 

Please Uphold and Defend the Constitution of the United States on these matters while keeping to the State constitution that a bureaucrat is not supposed to have a special position which is the equivalent of all having the right to equal protection. in so. None of this is to be read by Michael D Shrunk. I reject his leadership and declare him to be my families political enemy because he would allow us to be menaced with the threat of the equivalent of the Death Penalty and deny us due process of law while a threat is leveraged by his constituent which causes him to send the message, "I can prosecute you if you don't want to be named a victim", & "My constituents will make sure to make your daughter one if you don't let me represent you".

 

Please bear in mind all your hands as policemen or women are just as dirty as Judge Horner's if you don't put a stop to kicking in people's doors without a proper search warrant based of probable case because parents are being handed the equivalent of the Death Penalty everyday in 'America' -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law.)-

 

Judge Horner needs to be impeached - Please help send him the message he is not god

Please inquire Please Look up RULE 53 REFORM in a Google search...

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:12 AM


Oh, I'm allowed to see him any time I want, especially since she said, "I know youll be there everyday". Zack has allowed him to visit and gave him away but wants to enforce Full Custody and "no contact" only as far as the school is conserned, but not allowing me to tell them. (Will not allow me to call the school). <--- Right... Like she is my publisit and attorney like she was for my daughter...lo lol... My asssets are not in her 'sweet hands'.............

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: SPC Brian P Shaver's Mom is blessed! :)
Date: Apr 30, 2008 10:08 AM


Hon, are you saying that you are not being allowed to see your son???

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: mock tried
Date: Apr 30, 2008 12:01 PM


Folder One - #20



I know my son was gone for the weekend with his friends. Here I was trying to see if Darlene Roger's went with Bleu to find what kind of relationship Bleu and her have. (I am making sure she is not spending weekends with him trying to 'bond with him, or influence him on a serious, 'inappropriate', level.) All my questions seem to irritate her but I finally get her to communicate her dissatisfaction with the way I treat her.



That Saturday I spoke to Darlene's mother, June Rogers, at her home and she told me Dolly had the day off and was resting and relaxing and that it is funny she should say that 'she was at work', because she never takes the dog to work. I also was told she heard the dog earlier that morning.



On Monday I find out my son went to visit a friend he meet in Pre-school, Connor. I was told by Darlene Rogers this family lived in Salem, the family that Zachariah Burton Singleton was angry with for convincing Bleu 'his dad told them he could go live with them'. These are the people Zachariah put on the Status Quo as people he intended to give partial custody to. Zack had only met them once. This tells me, Bleu, again is trying to negotiate his way out of living with his father, as he did in the past, congruent with harsh feelings today, and that he does not feel he is settled or satisfied with Darlene Rogers as a permanent place to live, which is consistent with Bleu will have to make up his mind at the end of the School year about where he wants to live. Melanie told me Bleu is to blame for Zack and Jenna's divorce and that all they do is yell at him and that Jenna does not want him because he is not her flesh and blood. That Jenna wants Bleu to leave.



Bleu was enrolled in school before I found out he was in Portland. Temporary Guardianship papers were signed so Bleu could decide where he wanted to live. Darlene Rogers has told me, 'there is that Court Order in place' and she will not divert from it at the School but every where else is OK to ignore it as long as it does not come to the attention of the school. I called the school pretending to enroll a new student to see what the reaction would be when I told them my name. (My son reported Dolly complained as she came in the door after work on the day I contacted the enrollment department, PTA, etc. ). I am told by Darlene Rogers not to contact the school. My son expresses apprehension and said, "No body would accept your contact information even for a live and death emergency".



('For nearly one year I requested Darlene Rogers tell me the city Zack lived in so I could file a substitute service seeking visitation with my son'). In spite the fact, Zack currently has allowed visitation between Bleu and I, I am not placed on the school records as a person to contact in case of an emergency, but, it is OK with Darlene Rogers that I visit him and that I could begin visits right away even as early as 9:00 (that same day because Bleu had the whole day to spend before he started school) Darlene is at work - the time she stated she has a regular scheduled work day). I have explained to Darlene Rogers there was never a case brought against me regarding the allegations against my parenting, and that there was no reasonable cause to believe child abuse or neglect occurred, that CPS can not present a case because the statute of limitations is up, that one year has expired and this matter has not resolved itself yet, since Judge Horner ordered to hear from the CPS and they did not follow a direct court order, that I do not have to contact that agency according to my rights to Due Process when the case is closed and I am told the agency is not responding, that Judge Horner can not 'Adjudicate and then say he needs to adjudicate further, on the same matter, is against my right to not be tried twice', that I was not given a friar trial, not given an opportunity to present evidence, not allowed to ask questions to my opponent in court, that the original order to move Blue to his dad's was in violation of Supreme Court rule, [a home can not be made in a day, (or in seven months or in three years in this case,) A judge, like William Horner, is not supposed to stall in delivering his adjudication causing another violation when he signed papers not presented to him by a moving party, (making him party to the action) to prepare his own papers to sign, which Zachariah Singleton failed to do, also causing another compromise at the clerks office for putting such a document into the mail, now further, the worst offense I see, Judge Horner did in violation of the Separation of Powers, acting as DA, demanded discovery after he had delivered a verbal order, which has caused continual Arbitrarily Restraint which is currently my Death Penalty and exacted the method in which others inflict upon me 'social death', allowing others to Terminated my Parental rights, placing me under social duress to comply with further violations against the Oath of Office, (continually supporting, as current circumstances, the mute allegation asserted as cause to bring the Independence Police Department to Arrest my daughter and threaten to kick down my front door because I demanded CPS show a search warrant from a real judge. on and on, and on. I have had no show of support from Darlene Rogers other that what she claims as her obedience to what she is told to do even if she thinks it is so unjust and against all she would have for me in her heart.



My son told me, "My dad said I had a choice of places I could live". Darlene Rogers confirmed Zack did say Bleu could come to live with me and she has not revealed to me the details regarding what date someone contacted her regarding Bleu's wishes to no longer live with his dad. I have no information other than what I hear from my son and Melanie regarding this matter.



I have not been included in any conversations regarding how she portrays my relationship with herself when conversing with Bleu's father. Darlene Rogers has not explained why she, in spite my wishes she have no contact with Bleu, has put herself in as an alternate option for permanent placement when I have diligently (for the last year and more) explained to her and other people who announce to her my complaints and things I say, like; 'she is not allowed in my home', 'I am very angry with her for letting a criminal move in with my daughter while she was in foster care', 'that if the State bills me for the money given to her she will be the person I say should pay it back since she is in breach of contract and failed in her duty to supervise me daughter', 'I will not be attending holiday activities in her home anymore so don't invite me', 'if I had Bleu in my care she would not be allowed in his life at all', 'she is not to introduce me as her daughter to people', 'I resent the fact she has preserved her relationship with my son over mine by not helping me with the things I ask of her so I may take care of legal issues'. All these messages and conversations transpired prior to end of my and my son's alienated condition.



Darlene Roger's constantly sends the message she does not want to talk to me.



---------Why are my calls bad?



"No I just tried calling you a minute ago and it failed."



--------- Oh.



"Anyway, what, what is going on, what do you need?"



--------- Oh, I was just seeing about the ride to pick up Bleu.



Oh, well, why, that's ten hours or so, I got to go to work right now, I gotta' go pick up the kids from church.



"Well I'm trying to set an appointment what time...



Later on in the conversation she yells at me about how I don't even like her, you have not called me in years, your not calling to talk to me, your using my minutes, all the sudden you call me twenty times a day, you must have free minutes on your phone, Melanie won't let me baby-sit Victoria, I don't want to ride with you for two hours and listen to you. ( my legal interpretations ). tell me what to do, ( this would apply especially now that she has 'control' ) ., all you do is argue, I don't want to fight, (pre emptive - I just go on and on about Impeaching a judge and that is not what she wants to talk about and has stated "That is not what Bleu wants", ). [I know that is not what his dad wants and for Darlene Rogers to have Zack as a friend she is going to have to say, 'All hail to Horner's demand to try Marilyn LeBaron twice]. but she is not my son's lawyer when she is a direct opponent also contending for his permanency decision.and certainly she should not be a witness if she stands to directly gain from her testimony.



Darlene Roger's constantly sends the message she does not want to talk to me.

Folder 0ne - 1



[Phony Cheerfulness with stress in her voice all over the place].

She is letting me know she does not have time to talk to me.



Darlene Rogers.. Hello?



­­­­­­­­­­­---------Hey, What is going on? It's Marilyn.



Darlene Rogers.. Ah, I, Yeah!



---------Yeah!



Darlene Rogers.. Chuckle. You called early; I was getting in the shower.. Giggle. Oh! "Hello?"



---------Yeah!



---------Well, I mean I, was right there on the couch yesterday when you called Melanie to tell her you had Bleu.



Darlene Rogers.. "Yes!", "Yeah".



"That's what, yeah, I called. I-I told her, I told her, I said, "Well", yah, cause I, that way I know she could pass that on to you while I was on my way to work, cause I, she was just, I was just pulling up into the driveway.



"Yeah!"



and told her to pass that on".





----- Original Message -----

From: eBLAWg
To: robin.mimms@state.or.us
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:23 AM
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman


Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman

Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...

Please help me but I demand you keep this out of the hands of the CPS... (Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict of interest for them, who are being sued by millions all over this nation, to handle my allegation against them! -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law at the whim of a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish to uphold my right to incommunicado form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.

This matter should be treated as a matter for the Justice System and kept out of Family Court. I demand my son be left alone and you people rely on my tape recording of his free and relaxed statements while under my questioning! My son, as well as my daughter and I are potential witness against Darlene Rogers if it is proved she ''miss managed money entrusted to her'' by an elderly woman who embraced her as 'family', like we, the LeBaron family, were honored in the Roger's home for many years.

I have instructed my son to say, if ever questioned by the CPS, to say, "You are not my counsel of choice".
I do not allow any contact with my son at his school especially by a CPS worker and I do not authorize any psychological evaluations to be ordered by any State Agency or Child Protection Worker. This because of the Witherspoon case in California, which established as a president the one clinical evaluation can overturn three judges who all said Julie should get her kids back.

My son is being used as a messenger to show Darlene Roger's has more influence than me over the interpretations surrounding her method of restitution for moneys she claimed where taken by her mother without her knowing from a bank account in both their names. (This is what Bleu told me). June Rogers said she knows nothing of this and I agreed with her when she said she would never speak out against her daughter. I infer: (for her to put all the blame on her mother) if a SEARCH WARRANT was gotten it would have to be proved Darlene Roger's never opened a bank statement and all the checks or withdrawals would have to be signed in her mother's hand except the very last as Darlene Rogers claimed she took out herself full knowing the money's were almost depleted. She usually puts notes on her papers, checks, deposit slips, so forth. I know she does balance her bank statements as she normally does but I don't know what account she deposited the money in. Bleu said she had a new bank and that 'they' had a story if 'his dad was to ask'. (sos here please). I asked my son if he knew about the money, which Dolly said she spent, which belonged to Pearl, a long time friend of the Roger's women, June and her daughter, two women I considered to be, 'mom' and grand mom. My son has replied with what Darlene Roger's has prompted him to say if he is ever asked questions which is evidence there is a breach of trust between her and I, since she knows I am very angry with her and deliberately interfering with my son's return to me to keep us both in her nest. She snapping at me while in the middle of raising her voice to me, and confessing 'my true feeling for her', "I know you will be here everyday". She also said she knows I am not calling her to see her, which is a 'no brainer' because she has me and my son under her control and I have avidly expressed my discontentment with her without relenting for over a year now.

I fully expect Darlene's thinking is, "This will stay in the 'family', along with all the other arguments" while scolding me, "Melanie won't let me watch Victoria!", blaming that on me... then later moving to control me and my contact with her while visiting my son which resulted in an ultimatum and a direct order that I do not contradict her in front of 'my' son, and other petty things, after I asked her not to degrade me in front of him at our visits.

I am afraid of this woman and have been for quite some time now feeling like I am held hostage by her only praying to find a shred of evidence some where of how to contact my son's and his father. Zack being adamant about not having anything to do with me, him and his wife, Jenna, objecting of 'but loads of mail", according to my son who asked me if I had ever threatened them. My ILSUP has got me into trouble here (I think) because Bleu mentioned the pictures I drew, which his father showed him intending to complain about my poor judgment in mailing them to him. This is in evidence because Zack mailed those drawings to Judge Horner trying to make trouble for me. I am not a detective but insist on getting a reaction out of people and try to document what caused them to be so prejudice so I can reflect on what they report as cause, (reflecting on my probable cause rights) this to show they focus on all the stuff that came up after the fact of my prayers and praise to my pastor in the fall of 2004. Please see the State of Oregon protection of bureaucrat confused as cause after the SECOND SET OF 'non' consolidated, DOUBLE CASE CONTINUANCES 'partially consolidated', (RULE 53 See: Judge Luukinen for a CONSTITUTIONAL EXPLANATION). My ILSUP should not be a factor here since it never wound up in the discovery, which is true even in the Court Record and what Max R. Wall's based his Attestations UNDER OATH! [I NEVER EXPECTED THAT!] I was trying to get physical proof of what motivated my opponents on the matters pertaining to my children. Instead of justice I got diagnosed with a new mental disease though never in receipt of and invitation to 'family unity meetings' or offered a reunification plan for either my children.

Please Uphold and Defend the Constitution of the United States on these matters while keeping to the State constitution that a bureaucrat is not supposed to have a special position which is the equivalent of all having the right to equal protection. in so. None of this is to be read by Michael D Shrunk. I reject his leadership and declare him to be my families political enemy because he would allow us to be menaced with the threat of the equivalent of the Death Penalty and deny us due process of law while a threat is leveraged by his constituent which causes him to send the message, "I can prosecute you if you don't want to be named a victim", & "My constituents will make sure to make your daughter one if you don't let me represent you".

Please bear in mind all your hands as policemen or women are just as dirty as Judge Horner's if you don't put a stop to kicking in people's doors without a proper search warrant based of probable case because parents are being handed the equivalent of the Death Penalty everyday in 'America' -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law.)-


You have a copy of this already but it is relevant.

August 4, 2007

Department of Human Services
Child Protective Services
177 SW Oak St
Dallas, Oregon 97338


Dear Disclosure Officer,


Pursuant to the state open records law, Or. Rev. Stat. sec. 192.410 to 192.524, I write to request access to and a copy of any facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions regarding 'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect. If your agency does not maintain these public records, please let me know who does and include the proper custodian's name and address.


I agree to pay any reasonable copying and postage fees of not more than $.60 cents, as not to cause undue delay and for that reason only. If the cost would be greater than this amount, please notify me. Please provide a receipt indicating the charges for each document·

As provided by the open records law, I would request your response within seven (7) days.

If you choose to deny this request, please provide a written explanation for the denial including a reference to the specific statutory exemption(s) upon which you rely. Also, please provide all segregable portions of otherwise exempt material.


Please be advised that I am prepared to pursue whatever legal remedy necessary to obtain access to the requested records. I would note that willful violation of the open records law can result in the award of litigation costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney fees.

Thank you for your assistance.


Sincerely,



UCC 1-308, Thomas AB LeBaron, and Marilyn LeBaron, Power of Attorney in Fact, in Propria Persona by Special Visitation

portland, oregon [97233]

Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and postage if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither my children nor I wish any contact with your agency, period, for any reason.

DHS IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO BE OUR COUNSEL OF CHOICE. YOU ARE FIRED.

(503) 262-6723

----------------------------------

Any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller.



----------------------------------



any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Melanie LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding harm or eminent threat.



----------------------------------



any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include any and all Exhibits of 'Probable Cause' logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Definitions regarding harm or eminent threat with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect.



----------------------------------



any and all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------



all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to uphold the Sixth Amendment right to PRESENTMENT, in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, directly pertaining to CPS activity toward protecting my son from any damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect. Please include any documented comments from any staff members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes are included as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show cause for Marry Anne E Miller to say the disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE merited the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------



all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the case assigned on November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations to uphold the Sixth Amendment, our inalienable right to PRESENTMENT, entered in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS activity presented as protective or remedial toward protecting my son from damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect. Please include any documented comments from any staff members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes are included as Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005. Please include any letters of correspondence by and between any agencies authorized and mandated to cross report if said correspondence could be construed as cross reporting but limited your response to that which is directed from DHS staff toward the numerous letters mailed to DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351. My request is pursuant to the OAR definitions 'harm', conditions and circumstances, and ability to manage or recognize safety threats with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------



Please include any documented comments from any staff members, or letters of response regarding those letters, if any. Please include any authorities relied upon if those comments or notes included as Exhibits as 'Expert Testimony' and pertain to Thomas AB LeBaron, and date stamped prior to February 06, 2005. Please include any letters of correspondence by and between any agencies authorized and mandated to cross report if said correspondence which could be construed as cross reporting but limited your response to that which is directed from DHS staff toward numerous letters mailed to DHS from 1465 E. Street, Independence, Oregon 97351. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions 'harm', 'conditions and circumstances', 'ability to manage' or 'recognize' 'safety threats'



----------------------------------



all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, PCC C, Horner presiding, with relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the date November 21, 2005. Please include all invitations extended to DHS staff to uphold the Sixth Amendment, or PRESENTMENT, entered in numerous letters mailed to this address from Marilyn LeBaron prior to mid April of 2005, which directly pertaining to CPS activity in and attempt to gain an opportunity for a rebuttal of allegations presented to Zachariah B. Singleton on February 08, 2005 and presented as protective or remedial toward protecting my son from damages adjacent to the allegation of medical neglect.



----------------------------------



any facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III and the staff meeting held on February 14th, 2005, if it is relevant to the reason DHS came to my door on November 22, 2005. Please include all Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show there was any other finding possible other than a disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE for the January 10, 2005 call assigned to Marry Anne E. Miller. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions regarding 'harm' or 'eminent threat' with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect on two counts



----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file pertaining to O5P2064 & 05P2176, Singleton V. LeBaron, Polk County Circuit Court, Horner presiding, with the relevancy adjacent to Petition III, which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police Department, on November 18, 2005. Please include Exhibits of 'Expert Testimony' or releases for access thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are date stamped prior to February 06, 2005, to show cause Supervisory Staff had good cause to say, there would have been a FOUNDED case in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat'. My request is pursuant to OAR definitions 'harm', 'conditions and circumstances', and 'ability to manage or recognize safety threats', with respect to the allegation of Medical Neglect

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED case in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat', with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005. Please include any demands for access to any information thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only prior to April 2005 and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are relevant to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06, 2005

----------------------------------

all facts regarding the LeBaron case file that show cause for Supervisory Staff to say, "There would have been a FOUNDED case", in support of the use of the 'term' 'Major Safety Threat', with the relevancy adjacent to conversations with Zachariah Burton Singleton, and his petition for custody, which got the case assigned on November 21, 2005, but limited to what is directly adjacent to Chandra Snyder being present at the Independence Police Department on November 18, 2005

----------------------------------

Please limit phone contact to the cost of producing copies and postage if stipulated payment agreement is not sufficient. Neither my children nor I wish to be contacted CPS Agents, period, for any reason.

Please include any demands for access to any information thereto logged in DHS records, and DHS records only, prior to April 2005 and directly pertaining to Thomas AB LeBaron, which are relevant to any Points in Fact prior to the date February 06, 2005.

----------------------------------

----------------- Original Message -----------------
From: Kristin, an 'Edwards Democrat'
Date: Apr 12, 2008 8:59 PM


I can do. I was trying to read your myspace but my laptop won't cooperate. If you have a lot of stuff on your myspace, my computers eats it lol ;)

What is your son's name? I imagine you have a cause on your page. What it is? Also, when I repost this in bulletin or blog or both.... I will credit your myspace page! :)

Thanks!
Kristin



All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
              UCC 1-308
          Marilyn LeBaron  
                  &
          LeBaron Family
 
 
Thomas LeBaron
Victoria Couvillion
 
NTBAA 
 
THOMAS LEBARON VICTORIA COUVILLION without Due Process
 
Marilyn LeBaron
Melanie LeBaron

NTBAA 
 
MARILYN LEBARON MELANIE LEBARON without Due Process 

                                                  Yuwie  

http://www.yuwie.com/yuwie.asp?r=268928&vid=1365498

         Hit SIGN UP under the feet of Yuwie guy, enter your information,

            verify your account with the link sent to your e-mail account.

                    Please forgive the advertisements and junk mail.

                  (Hit 'SKIP' at the bottom of the page or No Thanks)

                       Hit the back button to get out of pop ups

---

Subject: RE: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:12:05 -0700
From: Charlene.Barber@state.or.us
To: e-for-mation@hotmail.com

Why did I get this?????

And who are you????

 

Charlene Barber 

DPSST

Executive Assistant

503-378-2043

charlene.barber@state.or.us

 

 

---

From: eBLAWg [mailto:e-for-mation@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:21 AM
To: BARBER Charlene
Subject: Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman

 

Regarding the Impeachment of Judge Horner ...'theft' from an elderly woman

 

Regarding the Impeachment of CPS...

 

Please help me but I demand you keep this out of the hands of the CPS... (Their hands are dirty). It is a conflict of interest for them, who are being sued by millions all over this nation, to handle my allegation against them! -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law at the whim of a SOCIAL SERVICE EXPERT)- I wish to uphold my right to incommunicado form the CPS and Michael D Shrunk.

 

This matter should be treated as a matter for the Justice System and kept out of Family Court. I demand my son be left alone and you people rely on my tape recording of his free and relaxed statements while under my questioning! My son, as well as my daughter and I are potential witness against Darlene Rogers if it is proved she ''miss managed money entrusted to her'' by an elderly woman who embraced her as 'family', like we, the LeBaron family, were honored in the Roger's home for many years.

 

I have instructed my son to say, if ever questioned by the CPS, to say, "You are not my counsel of choice".
I do not allow any contact with my son at his school especially by a CPS worker and I do not authorize any psychological evaluations to be ordered by any State Agency or Child Protection Worker. This because of the Witherspoon case in California, which established as a president the one clinical evaluation can overturn three judges who all said Julie should get her kids back.

 

My son is being used as a messenger to show Darlene Roger's has more influence than me over the interpretations surrounding her method of restitution for moneys she claimed where taken by her mother without her knowing from a bank account in both their names. (This is what Bleu told me). June Rogers said she knows nothing of this and I agreed with her when she said she would never speak out against her daughter. I infer: (for her to put all the blame on her mother) if a SEARCH WARRANT was gotten it would have to be proved Darlene Roger's never opened a bank statement and all the checks or withdrawals would have to be signed in her mother's hand except the very last as Darlene Rogers claimed she took out herself full knowing the money's were almost depleted. She usually puts notes on her papers, checks, deposit slips, so forth. I know she does balance her bank statements as she normally does but I don't know what account she deposited the money in. Bleu said she had a new bank and that 'they' had a story if 'his dad was to ask'. (sos here please). I asked my son if he knew about the money, which Dolly said she spent, which belonged to Pearl, a long time friend of the Roger's women, June and her daughter, two women I considered to be, 'mom' and grand mom. My son has replied with what Darlene Roger's has prompted him to say if he is ever asked questions which is evidence there is a breach of trust between her and I, since she knows I am very angry with her and deliberately interfering with my son's return to me to keep us both in her nest. She snapping at me while in the middle of raising her voice to me, and confessing 'my true feeling for her', "I know you will be here everyday". She also said she knows I am not calling her to see her, which is a 'no brainer' because she has me and my son under her control and I have avidly expressed my discontentment with her without relenting for over a year now.

 

I fully expect Darlene's thinking is, "This will stay in the 'family', along with all the other arguments" while scolding me, "Melanie won't let me watch Victoria!", blaming that on me... then later moving to control me and my contact with her while visiting my son which resulted in an ultimatum and a direct order that I do not contradict her in front of 'my' son, and other petty things, after I asked her not to degrade me in front of him at our visits.

 

I am afraid of this woman and have been for quite some time now feeling like I am held hostage by her only praying to find a shred of evidence some where of how to contact my son's and his father. Zack being adamant about not having anything to do with me, him and his wife, Jenna, objecting of 'but loads of mail", according to my son who asked me if I had ever threatened them. My ILSUP has got me into trouble here (I think) because Bleu mentioned the pictures I drew, which his father showed him intending to complain about my poor judgment in mailing them to him. This is in evidence because Zack mailed those drawings to Judge Horner trying to make trouble for me. I am not a detective but insist on getting a reaction out of people and try to document what caused them to be so prejudice so I can reflect on what they report as cause, (reflecting on my probable cause rights) this to show they focus on all the stuff that came up after the fact of my prayers and praise to my pastor in the fall of 2004. Please see the State of Oregon protection of bureaucrat confused as cause after the SECOND SET OF 'non' consolidated, DOUBLE CASE CONTINUANCES 'partially consolidated', (RULE 53 See: Judge Luukinen for a CONSTITUTIONAL EXPLANATION). My ILSUP should not be a factor here since it never wound up in the discovery, which is true even in the Court Record and what Max R. Wall's based his Attestations UNDER OATH! [I NEVER EXPECTED THAT!] I was trying to get physical proof of what motivated my opponents on the matters pertaining to my children. Instead of justice I got diagnosed with a new mental disease though never in receipt of and invitation to 'family unity meetings' or offered a reunification plan for either my children.

 

Please Uphold and Defend the Constitution of the United States on these matters while keeping to the State constitution that a bureaucrat is not supposed to have a special position which is the equivalent of all having the right to equal protection. in so. None of this is to be read by Michael D Shrunk. I reject his leadership and declare him to be my families political enemy because he would allow us to be menaced with the threat of the equivalent of the Death Penalty and deny us due process of law while a threat is leveraged by his constituent which causes him to send the message, "I can prosecute you if you don't want to be named a victim", & "My constituents will make sure to make your daughter one if you don't let me represent you".

 

Please bear in mind all your hands as policemen or women are just as dirty as Judge Horner's if you don't put a stop to kicking in people's doors without a proper search warrant based of probable case because parents are being handed the equivalent of the Death Penalty everyday in 'America' -(family law judges acting as god over Best Interests and ignoring every good standard of law.)-